The Harrogate Junior Chess Championship 2015 took place at Apley Grange on 21st March and attracted 28 entrants from local primary schools. The winners were as follows —
6-8 age group: 1st Edward Evans (Oatlands Infants) 2nd Conor Lister (Oatlands Infants) 3rd Lochlan Reah (Pannal)
8-9 age group: 1st William Bailey (Oatlands Junior) 2nd Lucas Moyser (Oatlands Junior) 3rd Isaac Young (Meadowside)
9-10 age group: 1st Max Houseman (Oatlands Junior) 2nd Kallum Shaw (Bilton Grange) 3rd Samuel Speight (Oatlands Junior)
10-12 age group: 1st Olivia Claire 2nd Matas Laukaitis (Western) 3rd Hugo O’Reilly Bolger (Oatlands Junior)
The Trumper Cup for the highest scoring school went to Oatlands Junior. All children taking part received a certificate. In addition to the competition Mick Stokes hosted a short training session for those present and the event proved very enjoyable for all involved. Harrogate Chess Club congratulates all winners and thanks the organisers for making the event happen.
For more information about the Harrogate and District Primary Schools Association, their website can be found at http://harrogatejuniorchess.com/
The ECF Board responded to a complaint in September regarding the British Under 8 Chess Championship as below. A subsequent decision was taken to accept British Under 8 Chess Championship results into the English Youth Grand Prix without alteration and this decision remains unchanged.
The British Under 8 Championship was a six round swiss system tournament. In the penultimate round, a dispute arose in the game between the joint leaders; both claiming different positions, one including an illegal move claim, one denying the claim. The control team investigated and asked the children about the position. Neither child varied their accounts. One claimed a win because of an illegal move; one claimed no illegal move was made. Both disagreed about the board position.
The British Chess Championships Chief Arbiter and Senior Members of his team were consulted about how to handle the matter. They concluded this was essentially a dispute about the facts rather than the application of the Laws of Chess. The Senior Arbiter indicated that the Laws provided that in a disputed/illegal position, the game should return to the last known legal position so that they could continue. One player was visibly upset and insisted that the illegal move was made and the game should be forfeited. He did not feel he could continue. Both players agreed that they did not wish to play on. It was suggested the game be postponed until after round 6 and that the pairings for round 6 be based on a hypothetical 0.5-0.5 score line. The arbiter team checked all the possible permutations of the round 6 pairings based on different score profiles. They concluded that the pairings would be identical however the scores had been allocated. Round 6 proceeded with the pairings.
After round 6, the arbiter team considered the equity of the outcome, and consulted with parents of the disputed round 5 game. All parties agreed that the fairest outcome would be to allow each child their claim. That is, one player was awarded a draw as his material was at least better than equal; the second player was awarded a win as he had a claim for an illegal move. This outcome was discussed and agreed by all the involved arbiters and by the parents who agreed that no solution was perfect but that this was the most equitable. It should be noted that this result (0.5-1.0) was not without precedent. It has been used in both youth and international tournaments in appropriate situations and agreed by the arbiters.
In considering the complaint, the Board considered that the scores were unusual but that in the circumstances of the dispute, the allocation of the points was justified. In the context of a complete disagreement about the facts, and with two very emotional eight-year-old children, the BCC Arbiter Team had put in place a balanced solution having considered all their possible options. The Board concurred with the report that the BCC Arbiter Team were not confronted with a dispute over the rules but a dispute about the facts. It had not been possible to resolve this dispute about the facts. The Arbiter Team, after due consideration, had implemented a reasonable and well considered solution. The Board were satisfied that the Arbiter Team acted with due consideration and with proper regard to process. They were an experienced team with many years of arbitering junior and international chess. The Board emphasised their confidence in the team and in the actions that they had undertaken.
- Phil Ehr, Chief Executive
The final three ECF National Schools events took place over the weekend in London – click here to read more …
Follow the links above [Play > English Youth Grand Prix] or click here
The final designated English Youth Grand Prix tournament for 7-16 year olds is the National Chess Junior Squad Championships, which are being held in Daventry from 11-12 April 2015. Click here for further details.